Supreme Court of Missouri· 12/22/1998
State v. Clark
Citations
- 981 S.W.2d 143
- 1998 WL 809528
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that keeping out a “critical fact” in voir dire “does not satisfy the defendant’s right to an impartial jury”
- explaining that the trial court is given wide discretion over the examination of prospective jurors during voir dire
- holding error in denying right to examine venire about critical facts
- reversing where the trial court refused to allow voir dire questions regarding potential bias arising from the “critical fact” that one of the victims was three years old
- identifying as source of prejudice questions that require the venire panel to speculate about how they will react to certain evidence
- \The purpose of voir dire is to discover bias or prejudice in order to select a fair and impartial jury.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duane Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court· 2005-11-23· cited 275×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-08-26· cited 232×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-06-30· cited 195×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-06· cited 152×
- State v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-12-07· cited 146×
- Cleveland Jackson v. Marc HoukSixth Circuit· 2012-07-24· cited 138×
- State v. WinfieldSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-11-09· cited 82×
- Ellington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-19· cited 61×
- McIntosh v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-11-26· cited 59×
- State v. OatesSupreme Court of Missouri· 2000-02-22· cited 56×
- State v. GilbertSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-04-22· cited 47×
- State v. BartonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-08-03· cited 40×
- Knese v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-10-22· cited 33×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-07-05· cited 33×
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2011-04-27· cited 28×
- State v. OusleySupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-12-24· cited 25×
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2006-02-13· cited 23×
- State v. LyonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-15· cited 20×
- Edgar v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-07-20· cited 13×
- State v. ReyesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-06-24· cited 12×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 1,649×
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 1,584×
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 1,568×
- State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri· 1987-12-15· cited 533×
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1950-05-01· cited 468×
- State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-12-21· cited 205×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri· 1983-04-26· cited 186×
- State v. LeisureSupreme Court of Missouri· 1988-04-19· cited 120×
- State v. KreutzerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-08-20· cited 114×
- State v. NicklassonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-03-24· cited 86×
- State v. GarrettSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-02-09· cited 82×
- State v. WacaserSupreme Court of Missouri· 1990-07-31· cited 79×
- Morford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1950-04-10· cited 77×
- State v. BettsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1983-02-23· cited 76×
- State v. GranberrySupreme Court of Missouri· 1972-09-11· cited 67×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri· 1977-03-14· cited 56×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri· 1988-04-19· cited 54×
- Littell v. Bi-State Transit Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1967-11-21· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.