Skip to main content

State v. Clark

Citations

  • 981 S.W.2d 143
  • 1998 WL 809528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that keeping out a “critical fact” in voir dire “does not satisfy the defendant’s right to an impartial jury”
  • explaining that the trial court is given wide discretion over the examination of prospective jurors during voir dire
  • holding error in denying right to examine venire about critical facts
  • reversing where the trial court refused to allow voir dire questions regarding potential bias arising from the “critical fact” that one of the victims was three years old
  • identifying as source of prejudice questions that require the venire panel to speculate about how they will react to certain evidence
  • \The purpose of voir dire is to discover bias or prejudice in order to select a fair and impartial jury.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duane Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.