Idaho Supreme Court· 3/12/1965
State v. Clark
Citations
- 399 P.2d 955
- 88 Idaho 365
- 1965 Ida. LEXIS 421
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting Id. Const, art. 12, § 2, which provides that “any county ... may make and enforce, within its limits, all. such local police . .. regulations as are not in conflict with its charter or with the general laws.”
- person can only challenge constitutionality of statute when and only insofar as it is being or about to be applied to his disadvantage
- person can only challenge constitutionality of statute when and only insofar as it is being or about to be applied to his disadvantage
- action by Board of County Commissioners \must be presumed valid until the contrary is shown\
- action by Board of County Commissioners “must be presumed valid until the contrary is shown”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knudson, McFADDEN, McQUADE, Oliver, Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boundary Backpackers v. Boundary CountyIdaho Supreme Court· 1996-03-18· cited 40×
- Harrigfeld v. District Court of Seventh Judicial District Ex Rel. County of FreemontIdaho Supreme Court· 1973-07-05· cited 35×
- Ready-To-Pour, Inc. v. McCoyIdaho Supreme Court· 1973-07-03· cited 33×
- State v. CantrellIdaho Supreme Court· 1972-04-04· cited 31×
- Oregon Shortline Railroad Co. v. City of ChubbuckIdaho Supreme Court· 1970-08-21· cited 26×
- Caesar v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-04-02· cited 23×
- Farrell v. Board of Com'rs, Lemhi CountyIdaho Supreme Court· 2002-12-27· cited 22×
- State Ex Rel. Andrus v. ClickIdaho Supreme Court· 1976-09-24· cited 21×
- State v. BowmanIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-12-22· cited 17×
- Wilkes-Barre AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-09-15· cited 17×
- Dry Creek Partners, LLC v. Ada County Commissioners Ex Rel. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-10-02· cited 16×
- Hobbs v. AbramsIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-01-28· cited 16×
- Potts Construction Co. v. North Kootenai Water DistrictIdaho Supreme Court· 2005-06-17· cited 16×
- Benewah County Cattlemen's Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-05-26· cited 14×
- State v. Michael Jay FreitasIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-08-12· cited 12×
- Citizens for Better Government v. County of ValleyIdaho Supreme Court· 1973-04-04· cited 10×
- Credit Bureau of Eastern Idaho, Inc. v. LecheminantIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-06-18· cited 9×
- Drake v. CravenIdaho Court of Appeals· 1983-10-11· cited 9×
- Town of Burnsville v. Kwik-Pik, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1991-07-25· cited 8×
- Miller v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-10-26· cited 7×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-04-12· cited 95×
- Chula v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-01-10· cited 66×
- Rowe v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court· 1950-05-10· cited 58×
- City of Lewiston v. MathewsonIdaho Supreme Court· 1956-11-13· cited 37×
- Howard v. MissmanIdaho Supreme Court· 1959-04-02· cited 35×
- Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court· 1952-05-01· cited 31×
- White v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court· 1959-04-27· cited 28×
- State v. HeitzIdaho Supreme Court· 1951-11-20· cited 27×
- Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union Local No. 328Idaho Supreme Court· 1951-06-27· cited 23×
- Ex parte CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-10-31· cited 22×
- Gartland v. TalbottIdaho Supreme Court· 1951-11-20· cited 18×
- State v. WendlerIdaho Supreme Court· 1961-03-23· cited 17×
- State Ex Rel. Nielson v. City of GoodingIdaho Supreme Court· 1953-12-23· cited 16×
- State v. QuongIdaho Supreme Court· 1902-01-15· cited 10×
- Terhaar v. Joint Class a School District No. 241Idaho Supreme Court· 1955-10-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.