Idaho Supreme Court· 3/18/1996

Boundary Backpackers v. Boundary County

Citations

913 P.2d 1141
128 Idaho 371
1996 Ida. LEXIS 26

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that individuals must allege an injury \not suffered alike by all citizens of the county.\
holding that individuals must allege an injury “not suffered alike by all citizens of the county.”
holding that unconstitutional provisions were not severable despite a severability clause because the provisions were “integral or indispensable to the ordinance”
confirming that an individualized injury resulting from the enforcement of an ordinance is sufficient to confer standing
declining to sever because to do so would “emasculate[] the obvious purpose of the ordinance”
allegation that county land use ordinance applicable to federal lands would negatively impact the business of a commercial guide by limiting the open space available for operating his business was sufficient to afford standing to challenge the ordinance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Silak, Schroeder, McDevitt, Trout

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.