Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2/28/1984
State v. Clappes
Citations
- 344 N.W.2d 141
- 117 Wis. 2d 277
- 1984 Wisc. LEXIS 2301
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- accused, who was questioned by police officers in the hospital following an automobile accident, was not `in custody' because, although he was surrounded by an `atmosphere of restraint,' the restraint was not `created by the [law enforcement] authorities'
- accused, who was questioned by police officers in the hospital following an automobile accident, was not 'in custody' because, although he was surrounded by an 'atmosphere of restraint,' the restraint was not 'created by the [law enforcement] authorities'
- accused, who was questioned by police officers in the hospital following an automobile accident, was not 'in custody' because, although he was surrounded by an 'atmosphere of restraint,' the restraint was not 'created by the [law enforcement] authorities'
- \Police station interrogation carries a strong presumption of custody....\
- “Police station interrogation carries a strong presumption of custody....”
- “[p]olice station interrogation carries a strong presumption of custody”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bablitch, Steinmetz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ClappesWisconsin Supreme Court· 1987-03-06· cited 96×
- Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-12-28· cited 91×
- Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-11-10· cited 88×
- Commonwealth v. FentoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-04-28· cited 47×
- People v. MilhollinSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-02-08· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. LucasKentucky Supreme Court· 2006-08-02· cited 31×
- State v. SchambowCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1993-04-14· cited 8×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-08-30· cited 8×
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-05-07· cited 6×
- Creque v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2018-02-09· cited 2×
- State v. BrockdorfCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-12-14
- State v. Daniel J. H. BarteltWisconsin Supreme Court· 2018-02-20
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2019-01-23
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 734×
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court· 1969-03-25· cited 661×
- United States v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1977-05-23· cited 408×
- State v. FeltonWisconsin Supreme Court· 1983-02-03· cited 134×
- Commonwealth v. D'NICUOLASupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-28· cited 49×
- State v. RossNebraska Supreme Court· 1968-04-05· cited 14×
- Howard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1969-01-07· cited 13×
- Shedrick & Beckwith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-12-29· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.