Skip to main content

State v. Christian

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 365

Syllabus

On appeal from a conviction and 36-month prison term for domestic violence, as well as the revocation of community control and consecutive 16-month prison term from two prior domestic violence convictions. Appellant's conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence; the jury did not lose its way in believing the victim's account, which was supported by physical evidence and first responders' testimony. The state did not commit prosecutorial misconduct by suggesting inferences about credibility that could be drawn from specific evidence and testimony at trial. The trial court's failure to include consecutive-sentencing findings in its judgment entry was a clerical error that could be cured by a nunc pro tunc entry. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part. Cause remanded for a nunc pro tunc sentencing entry.

Judges: Dingus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.