Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 6/9/1994

State v. Chrisman

Citations

885 S.W.2d 834
1994 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the existence of a single category is sufficient to warrant the imposition of consecutive sentences
holding that proof of two prior drug convictions, two weapons offense convictions and numerous misdemeanor driving offenses, was sufficient for a finding that the defendant had an extensive criminal record.
recognizing § 40-35-103(1)(B) as codification of principle th at nature and circumstances of offense and need for deterrence may justify denial of probation
finding two (2) drug convictions and two (2) weapons convictions a sufficient record to support consecutive sentencing
finding four prior felony convictions and numerous traffic convictions suppo rted trial cou rt’s finding of a n extens ive crimina l record
ordering a remand for resentencing after concluding that “this Court is unable to conduct an adequate review” because the trial court “failed to make separate findings as to which enhancement factors applied to which convictions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGinley, Peay, Tipton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.