State v. Choate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding interlocutory appeal constitutionally mandated by citation to Abney, without further discussion
• when judgment previously had been entered, appellate court had jurisdiction under former § 13-4033(2) of interlocutory appeal of double jeopardy claim because it “is constitutionally mandated”
• premising immediate appeal on fifth amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ring
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2003-04-03· cited 325×
• State v. Milenkovich
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-08-03· cited 54×
• State v. Baranco
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-11-15· cited 42×
• Nalbandian v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-06-27· cited 34×
• Huff v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-12-20· cited 20×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-16· cited 16×
• State v. Rearick
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-08-17· cited 7×
• State of Arizona v. Janice L. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-16
• Barnes v. Bernini
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-07-30