· 11/15/1994
State v. Baranco
Citations
- 884 P.2d 729
- 77 Haw. 351
- 1994 Haw. LEXIS 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the collateral order exception to hold that a defendant may take an interlocutory appeal of an order denying a pretrial motion to dismiss based on double jeopardy grounds
- issue whether defendant's constitutional right against double jeopardy would be violated unless indictment dismissed is question of law, reviewed under right/wrong standard
- issue whether defendant’s constitutional right against double jeopardy would be violated unless indictment dismissed is question of law, reviewed under right/wrong standard
- issue whether defendant's constitutional right against double jeopardy would be violated unless indictment dismissed is question of law, reviewed under right/wrong standard
- issue whether defendant’s constitutional right against double jeopardy would be violated unless indictment dismissed is question of law, reviewed under right/ wrong standard
- issue whether defendant’s constitutional rights against double jeopardy would be violated unless indictment dismissed is a question of law, reviewed under right/wrong standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.