State v. Childs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to exercise discretion to correct plain error in admitting a sexual abuse diagnosis where the error did not likely affect the court’s verdict
• declining to exercise discretion to correct plainly erroneous admission under Southard of sexual abuse diagnosis testimony in light of trial court’s indication that “it did not particularly rely on the sexual abuse diagnosis in reaching its decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Inman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 42×
• State v. Volynets-Vasylchenko
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-23· cited 11×
• State v. Pickett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-10-12· cited 6×
• State v. Arreola
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-20· cited 6×
• State v. Brooks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-01-25· cited 3×