Idaho Supreme Court· 6/29/2000
State v. Cheatham
Citations
- 6 P.3d 815
- 134 Idaho 565
- 2000 Ida. LEXIS 60
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that sufficient probable cause existed to support the issuance of the search warrant and that the information in the affidavit was not stale even though the affidavit contained typographical date errors
- “The general rationale behind the felony murder rule is that the intent to commit the felony substitutes for the malice requirement. Where the intent to commit the felony does not arise until after the homicide has occurred, the rationale behind the rule no longer applies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kidwell, Schroeder, Silak, Trout, Walters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Mark LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 2017-07-03· cited 67×
- State v. HoyleIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-10-28· cited 29×
- State v. HowardIdaho Supreme Court· 2001-05-07· cited 26×
- State v. Jonathan Earl FolkIdaho Supreme Court· 2017-09-20· cited 20×
- State v. PinaIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-03-18· cited 18×
- State v. SalatoIdaho Court of Appeals· 2001-12-13· cited 16×
- State v. LawIdaho Court of Appeals· 2002-01-11· cited 14×
- State v. PersonIdaho Court of Appeals· 2004-08-16· cited 14×
- State v. TappIdaho Court of Appeals· 2001-07-20· cited 10×
- State of Idaho v. Juan Carlos Fuentes Pina - FirstIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-07-08
- State v. Mark H. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 2016-07-25
- State v. McCarrollIdaho Court of Appeals· 2024-09-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.