New Mexico Supreme Court· 10/24/1966
State v. Chavez
Citations
- 419 P.2d 456
- 77 N.M. 79
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that it was \obvious\ when legislature amended narcotic drug law to include marijuana that it did so with apparent intent to make it controlling over marijuana law providing for lesser penalty
- stating that it was “obvious” when legislature amended narcotic drug law to include marijuana that it did so with apparent intent to make it controlling over marijuana law providing for lesser penalty
- stating that it was “obvious” when legislature amended narcotic drug law to include marijuana that it did so with apparent intent to make it controlling over marijuana law providing for lesser penalty
- explaining State v. Shondel, 22 Utah 2d 343, 453 P.2d 146 (1969) and its progeny
- explaining State v. Shondel, 22 Utah 2d 343, 453 P.2d 146 (1969) and its progeny
- the fundamental rule in construing statutes is to ascertain and give effect to legislative intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hensley, Moise, Chavez, Noble, Carmody
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-01-19· cited 165×
- People v. MarcySupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-03-09· cited 153×
- State v. CleveNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-03-11· cited 125×
- Commonwealth v. Parker White Metal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-09· cited 82×
- Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-01-02· cited 69×
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-06-16· cited 54×
- Atencio v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF PENASCO, ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-22· cited 41×
- Trujillo v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1971-02-15· cited 41×
- State v. LardNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-01-23· cited 37×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-10-09· cited 35×
- Bell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-07-27· cited 27×
- Johnson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-01-23· cited 26×
- State v. ArellanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-07-28· cited 24×
- Jensen v. New Mexico State PoliceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-01-23· cited 22×
- Webb v. HamiltonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-01-22· cited 20×
- Jaramillo v. JC Penney Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-01-08· cited 20×
- Lopez v. Ski Apache ResortNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-04-24· cited 19×
- State v. VickeryNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-06-20· cited 16×
- State v. FranklinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-10-29· cited 16×
- Manual Chavez v. J. E. Baker, WardenTenth Circuit· 1968-09-16· cited 15×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bulova Watch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 224×
- State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court· 1955-03-30· cited 127×
- State v. BlevinsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1936-08-17· cited 80×
- State v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 54×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 35×
- duPont v. MillsSuperior Court of Delaware· 1937-12-22· cited 33×
- City of Irving v. Dallas County Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1964-03-19· cited 16×
- People v. FieneCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-04-13· cited 15×
- Aragon v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1965-11-08· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.