Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1/16/2007

State v. Imbruglia

Citations

913 A.2d 1022
2007 R.I. LEXIS 6
2007 WL 91638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that in that case “there was no error in the trial justice’s denial of defendant’s request that the particular phraseology proposed by defendant be employed” because he “ ‘fairly covered’ the concept expressed by those words”
upholding the denial of a motion to suppress based on the array containing photos of six white men of similar ages with similar facial hair
affirming the denial of a motion to suppress after the trial justice relied, in part, on the “disclaimer document” shown to the witness
finding no error in a set of jury instructions in which trial justice “‘fairly covered’ the concept expressed by [the proposed phraseology]”
“If the trial justice concludes that he or she would have reached the same result as the jury did or that reasonable minds could differ as to the result, the motion for a new trial must be denied.”
“If the trial justice concludes that he or she would have reached the same result as the jury did or that reasonable minds could differ as to the result, the motion for a new trial must be denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Goldberg, Flaherty, Suttell, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.