Skip to main content

State v. Chapman

Citations

  • 322 Ga. App. 82
  • 744 S.E.2d 77
  • 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1754
  • 2013 WL 2350423
  • 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Pleadings, motions, and orders are construed according to their substance and function and not merely by nomenclature.”
  • “Pleadings, motions, and orders are construed according to their substance and function and not merely by nomenclature.”
  • “orders are construed according to their substance and function and not merely by nomenclature”
  • trial court’s declaration of a mistrial following the entry of the verdict “[notwithstanding nomenclature ... was in substance the sua sponte grant of a new trial, and we will therefore treat it as such”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.