Skip to main content

Mims v. State

Citations

  • 723 S.E.2d 486
  • 314 Ga. App. 170
  • 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 667
  • 2012 WL 539857
  • 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • witness’s testimony to explain conduct that had been called into question on cross-examination was relevant to issues at trial
  • witness’s testimony to explain conduct that had been called into question on cross-examination was relevant to issues at trial
  • evidence is relevant if it tends to prove or to disprove a material fact at issue, and every act or circumstance which serves to explain or throw light upon a material issue is relevant
  • evidence is relevant “if it tends to prove or to disprove a material fact at issue, and every act or circumstance which serves to explain or throw light upon a material issue is relevant”
  • evidence is relevant if it tends to prove or to disprove a material fact at issue, and every act or circumstance which serves to explain or throw light upon a material issue is relevant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dillard, Mikell, Boggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.