State v. Chapman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a 4-year increase in the decay period and noting that the defendant had fair notice of the change in the statute which occurred 92 days before the violation
• no ex post facto violation where amendment increased the six year limitation to ten years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Letalien
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2009-12-22· cited 79×
• State v. Haskell
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2001-11-05· cited 36×
• State v. Stoen
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1999-06-03· cited 30×
• Doe v. District Attorney
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2007-09-25· cited 24×
• State v. Marshall
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2003-11-14· cited 10×
• City of Norton v. Hurt
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-04-18· cited 7×
• Chambers v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2014-05-29· cited 5×
• State v. Hickey
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-12-23· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Collins v. Youngblood
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,864×
• Gryger v. Burke
  Supreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 726×
• State v. Vainio
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-10-05· cited 37×
• State v. Joubert
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-02-21· cited 31×
• State v. Woods
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1878-09-14· cited 6×