Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/22/1991
State v. Chapman
Citations
- 813 P.2d 557
- 107 Or. App. 325
- 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 820
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a working methamphetamine lab provided exigent circumstances for warrantless search
- concluding that a working methamphetamine lab provided exigent circumstances for warrantless search
- concluding that a working methamphetamine lab provided exigent circumstances for warrantless search
- concluding that a working methamphetamine lab provided exigent circumstances for warrantless search
- “We conclude that a working [meth] lab in an environment that poses a threat of immediate harm to life and property, presents exigent circumstances[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Muniz, Buttler, Rossman, De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MeeksTennessee Supreme Court· 2008-09-02· cited 176×
- People v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-03-12· cited 37×
- State v. GomezMontana Supreme Court· 2007-05-08· cited 36×
- State v. GabbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-07-13· cited 36×
- People v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-03-30· cited 23×
- State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-10-10· cited 15×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2008-05-30· cited 10×
- Coffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-09-23· cited 8×
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-11-30· cited 4×
- State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Alabama· 2014-04-04· cited 4×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 168×
- State v. GirardOregon Supreme Court· 1976-10-21· cited 40×
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-09-18· cited 25×
- State v. RubertCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-06-30· cited 14×
- State v. RivasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-18· cited 13×
- State v. RivasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-03-07· cited 10×
- State v. HeikkinenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-12-21· cited 6×
- State v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-10-03· cited 5×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-11-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.