Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 5/30/2008
Williams v. State
Citations
- 995 So. 2d 915
- 2008 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 103
- 2008 WL 2223068
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Based on the inherent dangers of an operating methamphetamine lab, we now hold that discovery of such a lab by law-enforcement officials constitutes an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless search” (emphasis added)
- “Based on the inherent dangers of an operating methamphetamine lab, we now hold that discovery of such a lab by law-enforcement officials constitutes an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless search” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Welch, Baschab, McMillan, Shaw, Wise
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MeeksTennessee Supreme Court· 2008-09-02· cited 176×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-06-29· cited 18×
- Michael Fred Wehrenberg v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-11-08· cited 9×
- State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Alabama· 2014-04-04· cited 4×
- State v. LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-10-04· cited 2×
- STATE OF MISSOURI v. GLEN EUGENE BROWNMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-07-19· cited 1×
- Cosby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-12-18
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 1,874×
- United States v. Paul Gary Rubin United States of America v. Louis Martin Agnes A/K/A Louis MartinThird Circuit· 1973-02-13· cited 286×
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1973-04-05· cited 168×
- Holder v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 164×
- United States v. Krystal T. Layne (01-6288) William Dick (01-6399)Sixth Circuit· 2003-04-01· cited 129×
- Ex Parte HilleySupreme Court of Alabama· 1985-12-20· cited 98×
- United States v. Timothy Michael WalshEighth Circuit· 2002-07-29· cited 93×
- People v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-07-10· cited 82×
- People v. OuelletteIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-12-20· cited 81×
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-05-19· cited 76×
- Ex Parte TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1995-05-12· cited 66×
- Loyd v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1966-05-05· cited 56×
- Kinard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1976-06-04· cited 56×
- State v. SkaggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-10-01· cited 40×
- Randy A. Kleinholz v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 2003-08-06· cited 39×
- State v. HargettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-02-25· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.