Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/25/2015
State v. Chandler
Citations
- 269 Or. App. 388
- 344 P.3d 543
- 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Lupoli, 348 Or 346, 234 P3d 117 (2010), did not disturb that rule as held in State v. Odoms, 313 Or 76, 83-84, 829 P2d 690 (1992)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Devore, Garrett, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
- State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-17· cited 149×
- State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 141×
- State v. LupoliOregon Supreme Court· 2010-06-04· cited 104×
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-09-26· cited 44×
- State v. OdomsOregon Supreme Court· 1992-04-02· cited 22×
- State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-08-14· cited 18×
- State v. TildenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-03· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.