State v. CECIL J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• psychological trauma not recognized as an “injury” for purposes of similar provision of rape shield statute
• ‘‘for purposes of examining the timeliness of [the] motion [for a contin- uance], the defendant . . . had months in which to seek judicial orders that would permit him to question witnesses who might otherwise be unavailable to tes- tify’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. CECIL J.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-02· cited 42×
• State v. Martinez
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-04-27· cited 22×
• State v. Anwar S.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-03-19· cited 8×
• State v. Martinez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-25· cited 6×
• State v. White
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-12-04· cited 5×
• State v. Williams
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-01-26· cited 2×
• State v. Cecil J.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-04-12· cited 1×
• State v. Rosa
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-06-10· cited 1×
• State v. Giovanni P.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-02-10
• State v. Griswold
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-10-20
• State v. Marvin Orellana-Castro
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-09-02
• State v. Godbolt
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-11-17
• State of Iowa v. Michael D. Montgomery
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2021-11-19