State v. Williams
Citations
- 202 Conn. App. 355
Syllabus
The defendant, who had been convicted of the crime of larceny in the first degree, appealed to this court, challenging various evidentiary rulings by the trial court and its denial of her request to secure the attendance at trial of several out-of-state witnesses pursuant to statute (§ 54-82i). The defendant had been a finance director for the state chapter of the American Red Cross and was responsible for reporting payroll informa- tion to P Co., which produced payroll checks and made direct deposits into American Red Cross employees' bank accounts. The defendant was responsible for using SPIN, an online reporting system, to report employee salaries and benefits to the national chapter of the American Red Cross. After the defendant's employment was terminated following a merger of several American Red Cross chapters, her responsibilities were taken over by L, the chief financial officer for the Connecticut American Red Cross. L compared P Co.'s records to the SPIN reports that the defendant had submitted and discovered that the defendant had paid herself $409,647.47 more than she was entitled to while she was employed by the American Red Cross. Thereafter, the defendant gave state police detectives a written, six page statement in which she admitted that she had embezzled money from the American Red Cross. Held: 1. The defendant could not prevail on her claim that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the SPIN reports into evidence pursuant to the statutory (§ 52-180) business records exception to the rule against hearsay because nothing in L's testimony indicated that the American Red Cross prepared the SPIN reports in the regular course of business; the record plainly indicated that the three statutory requirements for the admissibility of the SPIN reports under the business records exception to the hearsay rule were satisfied, as L testified that the defendant was responsible for submitting individual payroll information to the national chapter of t
Judges: Elgo; Cradle; Devlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Milton v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 824×
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-15· cited 228×
- State v. ShifflettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-05-20· cited 95×
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-06· cited 85×
- State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-10-11· cited 73×
- State v. IBAN C.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-10-04· cited 67×
- Ellis v. EmeryNinth Circuit· 2006-03-20· cited 63×
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-25· cited 62×
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-02-24· cited 59×
- River Dock & Pile, Inc. v. O & G Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-30· cited 56×
- State v. BetheaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-08-06· cited 48×
- State v. CECIL J.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-02· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. DirringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1968-06-21· cited 39×
- Davenport v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-06-20· cited 39×
- Calcano v. CalcanoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-31· cited 32×
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-03-17· cited 30×
- State v. StevensonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-06-01· cited 30×
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-07-21· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.