Hawaii Supreme Court· 5/20/1999

State v. Carvalho

Citations

978 P.2d 718
90 Haw. 280
1999 Haw. LEXIS 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the circuit court was entitled to consider a defendant’s history of setting fires and engaging in cruelty to animals
remanding to a different judge after the trial court used an improper sentencing procedure
a sentencing court must afford a defendant the right of presentence allocution “before ruling on the applicability of the young adult defendants statute”
“It should be noted that we are remanding for resentencing by a different judge because, inasmuch as [the circuit court judge] previously determined the appropriate length of sentence, remanding the matter to [the circuit court judge] would constitute an inadequate remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein, Levinson, Moon, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.