State v. Carter
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3855
Syllabus
Claims of ineffective assistance must fail where appellant does not demonstrate prejudice. Right to confront witnesses not violated through application of the rape shield law where probative value of questioning regarding the victim's true allegations of sexual assault by a third party would have been minimal on establishing that the victim was not credible. Expert witnesses are allowed to testify on the general characteristics of child sexual assault victims.
Judges: Pietrykowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 820×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-05· cited 802×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
- State v. KeenanOhio Supreme Court· 1993-06-16· cited 535×
- State v. BuellOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 295×
- State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 256×
- State v. StowersOhio Supreme Court· 1998-03-18· cited 177×
- State v. BoggsOhio Supreme Court· 1992-04-15· cited 165×
- State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-03· cited 143×
- Terry v. CaputoOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-03· cited 98×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1986-01-02· cited 65×
- State v. KaufmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-03-31· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.