Ohio Supreme Court· 3/18/1970
State v. Carter
Citations
- 21 Ohio St. 2d 212
- 256 N.E.2d 714
- 50 Ohio Op. 2d 446
- 1970 Ohio LEXIS 456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- by failing to exercise all peremptory challenges, defendant “acquiesced in the jury that was finally selected”
- because defendant “‘did not exhaust his peremptories,’” he “‘acquiesced in the jury that was finally selected’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corrigan, Duncan, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taet
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 1,077×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- State v. PoindexterOhio Supreme Court· 1988-03-23· cited 289×
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court· 1985-08-09· cited 237×
- State v. PierceOhio Supreme Court· 1992-09-02· cited 78×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-06· cited 13×
- State v. PierceOhio Supreme Court· 1992-09-01· cited 3×
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-08· cited 2×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-05· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- State v. EatonOhio Supreme Court· 1969-07-30· cited 145×
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court· 1964-12-29· cited 75×
- State v. WigglesworthOhio Supreme Court· 1969-06-11· cited 54×
- State v. PruettOhio Supreme Court· 1969-06-11· cited 17×
- State v. CramptonOhio Supreme Court· 1969-06-11· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.