State v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Taser designed as nonlethal weapon and should not be considered deadly weapon, although use may cause death or serious bodily injury in rare instances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Estate of Randolph v. City of Wichita
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-01-21· cited 19×
• State v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-03-06· cited 17×
• State v. Ford
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-07-19

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Godfrey
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-05-29· cited 489×
• Fils v. City of Aventura
  Eleventh Circuit· 2011-07-28· cited 330×
• Estelle Smith v. Richard L. LePage, Jr.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2016-08-25· cited 114×
• State v. Marinelli
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-04-13· cited 78×
• State v. Hanks
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1985-01-26· cited 44×
• State v. Prince
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1980-01-19· cited 42×
• Uhlmann v. Richardson
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-08-03· cited 42×
• Powers v. Taser International, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-01-04· cited 36×
• State v. Aldershof
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-11-06· cited 35×
• State v. Colbert
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1989-03-03· cited 35×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1980-01-19· cited 31×
• State v. Ibarra
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-02-16· cited 28×
• State v. Bateson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-12-11· cited 18×
• State v. Dean
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-01-17· cited 11×
• State v. Franklin
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-07-02· cited 8×