State v. Carson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an intoxicating chemical was not a \hazardous substance\ under the driving-while-impaired statute even though this plain-language interpretation resulted in no criminal liability for \a driver dangerously intoxicated by [the particular chemical]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bilbro v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-05-08· cited 3×
• Kelly Schneider, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Children's Health ...
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2023-10-11
• State of Minnesota v. Logan Hunter Vagle
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-08-06
• Lucas Peterson, Respondent, vs. City of Minneapolis, Self-Insured, Relator
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-07-16
• State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Logan Hunter Vagle, Appellant
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-08-06

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Christianson v. Henke
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-31· cited 99×
• ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of Dakota
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-03-17· cited 86×
• Jacky L. Larson v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, CMInformation Specialists, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-10-22· cited 53×
• Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-04-29· cited 52×
• Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-05-21· cited 35×
• Koep v. Karger
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-11-21· cited 21×
• In Re Estate of Karger
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-11-21· cited 19×
• Troyer v. Vertlu Management Co./Kok & Lundberg Funeral Homes
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-08-17· cited 11×
• State of Minnesota v. Chantel Lynn Carson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-09-06· cited 1×