· 3/17/2005
ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of Dakota
Citations
- 693 N.W.2d 412
- 2005 Minn. LEXIS 113
- 2005 WL 612718
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a provision in a statute must be read in context with other provisions of the same statute in order to determine meaning
- noting that a provision in a statute must be read in context with other provisions of the same statute in order to determine meaning
- noting that “[wjhenever possible, no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant” (quotation omitted)
- stating that “[wjhenever possible, no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant” (quotation omitted)
- explaining that \grammar is a complementary analytical tool for understanding how language is used to convey meaning\
- stating that courts must “read a particular provision in context with other provisions of the same statute in order to determine the meaning of the particular provision”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Barry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.