Skip to main content
· 3/17/2005

ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of Dakota

Citations

  • 693 N.W.2d 412
  • 2005 Minn. LEXIS 113
  • 2005 WL 612718

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a provision in a statute must be read in context with other provisions of the same statute in order to determine meaning
  • noting that a provision in a statute must be read in context with other provisions of the same statute in order to determine meaning
  • noting that “[wjhenever possible, no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant” (quotation omitted)
  • stating that “[wjhenever possible, no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant” (quotation omitted)
  • explaining that \grammar is a complementary analytical tool for understanding how language is used to convey meaning\
  • stating that courts must “read a particular provision in context with other provisions of the same statute in order to determine the meaning of the particular provision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Barry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.