Washington Supreme Court· 3/14/1996
State v. Carson
Citations
- 912 P.2d 1016
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a defendant is brought to trial for speedy trial purposes when the case is called for trial and the trial court hears and disposes of preliminary motions
- “[C]ounsel for a defendant bears some responsibility for asserting CrR 3.3 rights of a client and assuring compliance with the rule before the speedy trial period expires.”
- \ Our courts of appeal have consistently held that unavailability of counsel may constitute unforeseen or unavoidable circumstances to warrant a trial extension under CrR 3. 3. \
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ChhomWashington Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 49×
- State v. Mullin-CostonWashington Supreme Court· 2004-07-15· cited 32×
- State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-29· cited 31×
- State v. CarlyleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-11-08· cited 30×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-01-26· cited 29×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-04-13· cited 28×
- State v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-11-17· cited 26×
- State v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-07· cited 26×
- State v. BolarCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-08-18· cited 24×
- State v. BolarCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-10-01· cited 23×
- State v. LedenkoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-07-17· cited 21×
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-23· cited 21×
- State v. Ralph Vernon G.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-27· cited 19×
- State v. Chavez-RomeroCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-09-11· cited 19×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-07-21· cited 18×
- State v. Heredia-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-11-17· cited 18×
- State v. MankinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-10-19· cited 17×
- State v. AhluwaliaWashington Supreme Court· 2001-05-17· cited 17×
- State v. ManroCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-10· cited 13×
- State v. CobabeWashington Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 12×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court· 1824-03-23· cited 1,814×
- State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court· 1984-12-28· cited 303×
- Roscoe v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 212×
- State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court· 1986-05-13· cited 211×
- State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-04· cited 169×
- Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1984-06-21· cited 159×
- State v. FladeboWashington Supreme Court· 1989-09-28· cited 99×
- In re BeachumSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 88×
- State v. McIntyreWashington Supreme Court· 1979-09-27· cited 87×
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 1984-03-15· cited 77×
- State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-03-14· cited 74×
- State v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court· 1980-08-21· cited 69×
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 1982-03-04· cited 66×
- State v. AleshireWashington Supreme Court· 1977-09-15· cited 57×
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court· 1980-10-09· cited 56×
- State v. RaperCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-04-29· cited 41×
- Department of Licensing v. LaxWashington Supreme Court· 1995-02-16· cited 40×
- State v. ConnorsWashington Supreme Court· 1962-05-10· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.