Washington Supreme Court· 3/4/1982
State v. Jones
Citations
- 641 P.2d 708
- 97 Wash. 2d 159
- 1982 Wash. LEXIS 1299
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that discharge has the same effect as acquittal \`unless such discharge was necessary in the interest of the proper administration of public justice'\ (emphasis omitted) (quoting State v. Connors, 59 Wash.2d 879, 883, 371 P.2d 541 (1962))
- finding that discharge has the same effect as acquittal “ ‘unless such discharge was necessary in the interest of the proper administration of public justice’ ” (emphasis omitted) (quoting State v. Connors, 59 Wn.2d 879, 883, 371 P.2d 541 (1962))
- finding that discharge has the same effect as acquittal \`unless such discharge was necessary in the interest of the proper administration of public justice'\ (emphasis omitted) (quoting State v. Connors, 59 Wn.2d 879, 883, 371 P.2d 541 (1962))
- finding that “hopeless deadlock is an ‘extraordinary and striking’ circumstance”
- finding that discharge has the same effect as acquittal '\unless such discharge was necessary in the interest of the proper administration of public justice\' (emphasis omitted) (quoting State v. Connors, 59 Wn.2d 879, 883, 371 P.2d 541 (1962))
- finding the grant of a mistrial-after the jury had deliberated well into the middle of the night-was an abuse of discretion where there was no indication of a deadlock and the jury simply needed more time to deliberate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pearson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 1984-03-15· cited 77×
- State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-03-14· cited 74×
- State v. StrineWashington Supreme Court· 2013-01-31· cited 68×
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-03-07· cited 63×
- State v. ErvinWashington Supreme Court· 2006-11-30· cited 60×
- State v. GoldbergWashington Supreme Court· 2003-07-24· cited 47×
- State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-01-10· cited 28×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-08-27· cited 22×
- State v. KirkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-04-02· cited 21×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-12-11· cited 19×
- State v. BurdetteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-12-03· cited 19×
- State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-10-18· cited 18×
- State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-12-22· cited 15×
- State v. DespenzaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-09-10· cited 15×
- State v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-18· cited 14×
- State v. SheetsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-06-21· cited 13×
- Gregorio Jimenez v. E.R. Myers, Warden Attorney General of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1993-12-08· cited 12×
- State v. DykstraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-01-13· cited 11×
- State v. GlasmannWashington Supreme Court· 2015-05-07· cited 11×
- State v. JuarezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-27· cited 11×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 1,215×
- State v. BoogaardWashington Supreme Court· 1978-10-26· cited 54×
- State v. ConnorsWashington Supreme Court· 1962-05-10· cited 38×
- State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-12-20· cited 35×
- State v. MorlockWashington Supreme Court· 1976-12-02· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.