Supreme Court of Vermont· 12/1/2000
State v. Carroll
Citations
- 765 A.2d 500
- 171 Vt. 395
- 31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20309
- 2000 Vt. LEXIS 321
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that third-party claim for contribution and indemnification for cleanup costs could not be brought until state brought claim against defendant
- \The statutory scheme is intended to hold all parties responsible for hazardous materials contamination accountable for the costs associated with its proper clean-up and disposal.\
- “The statutory scheme is intended to hold all parties responsible for hazardous materials contamination accountable for the costs associated with its proper clean-up and disposal”
- “Res judicata, or claim preclusion, generally bars the litigation of a claim if there exists an earlier final judgment in which the parties, subject matter and causes of action are identical or substantially identical.” (internal quotation omitted)
- discussing the rule against claim splitting
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dooley, Morse, Skoglund, Davenport, Supr, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Howe Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-08-06· cited 20×
- The Estate of Richard S. Daniels, by and through Julie Lyford in her capacity asSupreme Court of Vermont· 2022-01-14· cited 4×
- All Metals RecyclingVermont Superior Court· 2015-12-04
- Barefoot & Zweig Act 250 AppealVermont Superior Court· 2013-04-08
- Barefoot & Zweig Act 250 AppealVermont Superior Court· 2013-04-05
- state v. bradford oilVermont Superior Court· 2023-12-29
- Brandt v. PallitoVermont Superior Court· 2017-09-01
- Burke v. DemlVermont Superior Court· 2024-12-16
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-04-21· cited 121×
- Carmichael v. Adirondack Bottled Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-12-10· cited 99×
- Russell v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-04-12· cited 23×
- Shapiro v. AlexandersonS.D. New York· 1990-07-09· cited 17×
- Wursthaus, Inc. v. CerretaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-11· cited 17×
- Riblet Tramway Co. v. Marathon Electronics-Avtek Drive DivisionSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-01-15· cited 8×
- Lanziano v. CocozielloNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-10-27· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.