Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/5/2002
State v. Carrasco
Citations
- 259 Conn. 581
- 791 A.2d 511
- 2002 Conn. LEXIS 87
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding Hispanic males were not a distinctive group
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Katz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 2,446×
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 2,373×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 214×
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-07-11· cited 110×
- State v. TillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-12-03· cited 86×
- State v. MukhtaarSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-17· cited 75×
- State v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-09-04· cited 74×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 74×
- McGee v. Screw Conveyor Corp.Supreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 67×
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-09-19· cited 66×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-21· cited 47×
- State v. McDougalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-08· cited 30×
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-04-16· cited 29×
- State v. RigualSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-08· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.