Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/10/1992
State v. Carlson
Citations
- 833 P.2d 463
- 66 Wash. App. 909
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial judge's participation in Kid's Court, program designed to prepare children who were victims of sexual abuse to testify in court, did not warrant disqualification from criminal trial for child rape
- trial judge’s participation in Kid’s Court, program designed to prepare children who were victims of sexual abuse to testify in court, did not warrant disqualification from criminal trial for child rape
- describing former CJC Canon 3(C)(1) (1988)
- describing former CJC, Canon 3(C)(1)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forrest
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sherman v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1995-11-16· cited 143×
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 113×
- State v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court· 2007-07-19· cited 92×
- Tatham v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-08-14· cited 75×
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-02· cited 45×
- State v. KnowltonIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-06-10· cited 40×
- In Re SwensonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-12-06· cited 20×
- In re the Personal Restraint of SwensonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-12-06· cited 20×
- Faghih v. WASH. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, DENTAL QUALITY ASSUR. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-02-17· cited 5×
- Faghih v. Department of Health, Dental Quality Assurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-02-17· cited 5×
- Hebbeler v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals· 1994-03-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.