New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 12/15/1994
State v. Canty
Citations
- 650 A.2d 391
- 278 N.J. Super. 80
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Under circumstances demonstrating adequate notice, a court may proceed with a motion to suppress and a trial even in the defendant’s absence.”
- when defendant fails to appear at suppression hearing, “the court may either postpone the hearing ... or proceed in absentia. The court should not dismiss the motion with prejudice”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Baime, Kestin and Ariel A. Rodriguez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-12-23· cited 55×
- Satoko Matsumoto v. Tatsuya MatsumotoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-01-30· cited 40×
- Robinson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-11-14· cited 22×
- State v. GivensNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-07-15· cited 5×
- Smolka v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-06-23· cited 3×
- State v. RobertsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-08-08· cited 3×
- State v. FisherNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-11-07· cited 2×
- State v. RuperdIdaho Court of Appeals· 2009-02-06· cited 1×
- State of Tennessee v. Allen KelleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2012-11-09
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1970-01-20· cited 536×
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-03-08· cited 401×
- Estelle v. DorroughSupreme Court· 1975-04-14· cited 312×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1876-11-27· cited 268×
- Eisler v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 117×
- Bohanan v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1887-10-17· cited 109×
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-05-30· cited 52×
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-07-01· cited 18×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. John Winston JamesThird Circuit· 1980-05-20· cited 11×
- State v. AckersonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1855-06-15· cited 9×
- State v. PrinceNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-02-04· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.