State v. Cannon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[ejxtrinsic evidence is permissible . . . when it directly contradicts a witness’s testimony because such evidence does not attack the witness’s general credibility, but rather the truthfulness of the specific testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Figlioli v. R.J. Moreau Companies
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-01-06· cited 31×
• State v. Higgins
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-04-07· cited 21×
• State v. Abraham DePaula
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2017-06-22· cited 9×
• State v. Jamie F. Letarte
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-12-09· cited 8×
• State v. Glodgett
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-11-26· cited 5×
• State v. Eddington
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2023-02-16· cited 5×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Howard
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-02-23· cited 119×
• State v. Williams
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1986-01-02· cited 65×
• State v. Vandebogart
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-12-09· cited 60×
• State v. Mountjoy
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-03-18· cited 46×
• State v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-11-02· cited 27×
• State v. Frost
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-12-18· cited 19×
• State v. Calbero
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1989-12-28· cited 18×
• State v. Goulet
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-05-28· cited 13×
• State v. Young
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-12-16· cited 12×
• State v. Mello
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-09-16· cited 10×