State v. Candelario

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the application of the six-month rule as mandatory “upon a defendant’s appropriate invocation of the right to a timely trial” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Martinez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-04-07· cited 112×
• State v. Mendoza
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-05-31· cited 49×
• State v. Flores
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 40×
• State v. Saavedra
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-12-21· cited 39×
• State v. Lobato
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-03-15· cited 36×
• State v. Rackley
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-02-11· cited 35×
• State v. Eskridge
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-09-15· cited 34×
• State v. Trujillo
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-10-29· cited 34×
• State v. Angel
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-07-24· cited 28×
• State v. Carreon
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-10-06· cited 24×
• State v. Carreon
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-11-29· cited 19×
• State v. Dominguez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-08-21· cited 18×
• County of Los Alamos v. Beckman
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-09-06· cited 8×
• State v. Lucero
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-06-13· cited 1×