State v. Campbell
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1693
Syllabus
Shooting attempted murder self-defense Crim.R. 29 manifest weight of the evidence attempted murder felonious assault transferred intent authentication firearm specifications consecutive sentences. Judgment affirmed. The weight of the evidence supported the convictions. A self-defense claim is generally an issue of credibility and the jury's decision to believe the defendant's self-defense as to one victim but not the other victim was not incredible. Under the theory of transferred intent, the felonious assault convictions as to the remaining victims were supported by the weight of the evidence. The evidence demonstrates that those victims were innocent bystanders in the crosshairs of the defendant's line of firing. There was no plain error or ineffective assistance of counsel based on the court's failure to instruct the jury on the concept of transferred intent of self-defense. It is not definitively established in this district that the doctrine of transferred intent applies to self-defense claims. Therefore, such an instruction would have been inappropriate. The defendant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence. In regard to one victim, the defendant told her he was shooting at her and would continue to do so. The defendant did continue to shoot at the victim even after she had dropped her weapon. In regard to the other two bystander victims, the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions against the defendant under the theory of transferred intent. Further, circumstantial evidence demonstrated venue. Statements made and injuries documented by a treating nurse did not have the primary purpose of being testimonial. Rather, they were made for the purpose of medical diagnosis and treatment. There was no violation of appellant's confrontation rights regarding the nurse's testimony and the admission of the medical records. A witness's testimony that she recognized the scene depicted in a video, recognized the person being videotaped, and that the vi
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GuffieOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-06· cited 12×
- State v. RhoadesOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-03· cited 4×
- State v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-27· cited 3×
- State v. BradleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-30· cited 2×
- State v. ShartleOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-21· cited 2×
- State v. McCleeryOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-09
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-12
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-02
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- Murphy v. Carrollton Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-08-28· cited 427×
- State v. RicheyOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-12· cited 380×
- State v. HeadleyOhio Supreme Court· 1983-09-07· cited 362×
- State v. MessengerOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-21· cited 321×
- State v. DeverOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-19· cited 262×
- State v. Spaulding (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-15· cited 143×
- State v. Wilks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-04-24· cited 127×
- State v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 101×
- State v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals· 2007-03-13· cited 72×
- State v. MessengerOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-17· cited 68×
- State v. MayOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-15· cited 31×
- State v. ChintalapalliOhio Supreme Court· 2000-02-16· cited 28×
- State v. VanderhorstOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-29· cited 20×
- State v. HaneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-28· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.