State v. Cain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the Supreme Court reiterated that “if one offense requires proof of additional facts which the other does not, the accused may be tried and convicted on both offenses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Steele
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-09-24· cited 207×
• State v. Knowles
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-12-15· cited 157×
• State Ex Rel. Watson v. Ferguson
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-12-19· cited 58×
• State v. Nichols
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-09-13· cited 48×
• State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Hamilton
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-04-28· cited 32×
• State v. Doucet
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-06-09· cited 27×
• State v. Beavers
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1981-02-09· cited 18×
• State v. Cox
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-11-14· cited 11×
• State v. Zeno
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-09-19· cited 7×
• State v. Duhon
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-05-14· cited 5×
• State v. Smith
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2018-01-10· cited 3×
• State v. Finley
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-10-06· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Johnson v. Zerbst
  Supreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
• Ashe v. Swenson
  Supreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
• Benton v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
• United States v. Oppenheimer
  Supreme Court· 1916-12-04· cited 417×
• Smith v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1949-05-31· cited 174×
• Gibbs v. Burke
  Supreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 150×
• State v. Roberts
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1922-06-27· cited 38×