Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 5/14/1991
State v. Cabral
Citations
- 810 P.2d 672
- 8 Haw. App. 506
- 1991 Haw. App. LEXIS 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In our view, the most appropriate method to allege one offense committed in two different ways is to allege in one count that the defense committed the offense (a) in one way ‘and/or’ (b) in a second way.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burns, Heen, Tanaka
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-28· cited 259×
- State v. LaTourelleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-20· cited 83×
- State v. CorreaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1985-09-11· cited 32×
- State v. DowHawaii Supreme Court· 1991-02-13· cited 32×
- Kaiama v. AguilarHawaii Supreme Court· 1985-03-12· cited 25×
- People v. HostyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-08-05· cited 24×
- State v. LemaluHawaii Supreme Court· 1991-04-11· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.