Skip to main content

State v. Cable

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 3923

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to appoint a DNA expert for Appellant at state expense. Appellant failed to show a particularized need for the expert. The trial court did not err by declining to merge the offenses of aggravated burglary and aggravated robbery. Each offense involved separate conduct that caused separate, identifiable harm. The convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. DNA evidence found at the scene linked Appellant to the crimes. Judgment affirmed. (Donovan, J., concurring in judgment only.)

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.