State v. Cable
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3923
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to appoint a DNA expert for Appellant at state expense. Appellant failed to show a particularized need for the expert. The trial court did not err by declining to merge the offenses of aggravated burglary and aggravated robbery. Each offense involved separate conduct that caused separate, identifiable harm. The convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. DNA evidence found at the scene linked Appellant to the crimes. Judgment affirmed. (Donovan, J., concurring in judgment only.)
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. MasonOhio Supreme Court· 1998-06-17· cited 600×
- State v. BroomOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 575×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 491×
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court· 2000-12-20· cited 489×
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 457×
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 310×
- State v. Pountney (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-04· cited 174×
- Leatrice Little v. Bill ArmontroutEighth Circuit· 1987-12-23· cited 149×
- State v. HazleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-10· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.