Skip to main content

State v. Byrd

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1069

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying Byrd's motion to suppress, the sufficiency and manifest weight of the evidence supported Byrd's convictions, and Byrd did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel. However, because the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences without making the requisite findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4), we must remand this matter for resentencing.

Judges: Luper Schuster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.