State v. Byrd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “when a court is called upon to determine the constitutionality of a legislative enactment, it must be careful not to usurp the legislative function.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Cannon
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-11-06· cited 26×
• State v. Carrigan
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-12· cited 19×
• Eagle Container Co. Ex Rel. Estate of Spotts v. County of Newberry
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-10-31· cited 16×
• American Petroleum Institute v. South Carolina Department of Revenue
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-05-04· cited 10×
• Y. C. Ballenger Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Reach-All Sales, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-01· cited 6×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Parker v. Levy
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 1,846×
• Leary v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 1,672×
• Barnes v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 793×
• Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 535×
• United States v. Gainey
  Supreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 481×
• State v. Tabory
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-04-05· cited 29×