Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/31/2025
State v. Byrd
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5857
Syllabus
Compel disclosure; confidential informant; qualified privilege. Reversed and remanded. The trial court erred in granting the defendant's motion to compel the disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant who did not witness the criminal acts underlying any of the charges in the indictment.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 1,335×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- In re The City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2010-06-09· cited 215×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-03· cited 143×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 118×
- State v. Wintermeyer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-12-17· cited 80×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 1992-09-09· cited 43×
- State v. Port Clinton Fisheries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-07-18· cited 27×
- State v. PettyOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-06· cited 2×
- State v. HowzeOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.