State v. Burton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well established that spontaneous statements made by an individual while in custody are admissible despite the absence of Miranda warnings.” (quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Patterson
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-02-04
• State v. Burleson
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2023-10-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• California v. Carney
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
• Williams v. Dormire
  Supreme Court· 2001-03-19· cited 167×
• State v. Isleib
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1987-06-02· cited 44×
• Enriquez v. Livingston
  Supreme Court· 2012-02-21· cited 29×
• State v. Givens
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-03-01· cited 4×