State v. Burton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “exculpatory content of the remark is a factor to be weighed in determining whether it was a product of reflective thought”
• holding a statement was not an excited utterance because it was self-serving, “removed by time and distance” from the startling event, and was not made under “apparent stress from the continuing effects of any physical trauma”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Peite
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1992-08-27· cited 45×
• State v. Kay
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1996-10-30· cited 31×
• State v. Thorngren
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2010-10-01· cited 24×
• Boyd v. City of Oakland
  N.D. California· 2006-10-17· cited 20×
• State v. Pavlik
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-12-22· cited 20×
• State v. Hansen
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1999-08-10· cited 19×
• State v. Ogden
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-03-21· cited 12×
• State v. Stover
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1994-08-09· cited 10×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Poggi
  California Supreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 338×
• State v. Parker
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1986-11-19· cited 23×