Skip to main content
· 10/1/2010

State v. Thorngren

Citations

  • 240 P.3d 575
  • 149 Idaho 729
  • 2010 Ida. LEXIS 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating the court has repeatedly held that rulings on claims of attorney-client privilege are reviewed for an abuse of discretion
  • noting trial court has “discretion to change its own pretrial rulings, especially evidentiary rulings”
  • “[T]his Court recognizes that news of a loved one’s unexpected death would be sufficiently shocking to render inoperative the reflective thought process of a declarant for a brief period of time.”
  • “[T]his Court recognizes that news of a loved one’s unexpected death would be sufficiently shocking to render inoperative the reflective thought process of a declarant for a brief period of time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Well

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.