Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 5/16/2017
State v. Burris
Citations
- 799 S.E.2d 452
- 253 N.C. App. 525
- 2017 WL 2118659
- 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 381
Syllabus
motion to suppress self-incriminating statement, warrantless blood draw, motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- giving State “benefit of every reasonable inference” when reviewing sufficiency of the evidence
- giving State “benefit of every reasonable inference” when reviewing sufficiency of the evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stroud
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court· 2016-06-23· cited 1,440×
- State v. RomanoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-04-19· cited 10×
- State v. PortilloCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-06-07· cited 5×
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-07-19· cited 2×
- State v. RomanoSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2016-08-18· cited 1×
- State v. RomanoSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2016-05-24· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.