Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/16/1981
State v. Burrell
Citations
- 625 P.2d 726
- 28 Wash. App. 606
- 1981 Wash. App. LEXIS 2051
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that photo montage was impermissibly suggestive where defendants’ photo was “a closer view than the others, which might have tended to call attention to his photo,” and “[n]one of the other individuals had a ‘frizzy Afro’ hairstyle as long as [the defendant]’s.”
- suspect described as having frizzy Afro hairstyle; defendant was the only subject in montage with that distinctive characteristic
- suspect described as having “frizzy Afro” hairstyle; defendant was the only subject in montage with that distinctive characteristic
- suspect described as having “frizzy Afro” hairstyle; defendant was the only subject in montage with that distinctive characteristic
- photomontage was impermissibly suggestive as to both witnesses where defendant was only person pictured with unique hairstyle described by one witness because that distinctive characteristic made the defendant stand out
- defendant only person in photo montage with “frizzy Afro” 4 hairstyle
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. VaughnWashington Supreme Court· 1984-05-24· cited 52×
- State v. RamiresCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-01-08· cited 30×
- McMorran v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-05-17· cited 29×
- State v. WeddelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-05-29· cited 28×
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-03-16· cited 26×
- State v. SheaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-02-07· cited 10×
- State Of Washington, V. Christopher Lee DerriCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-05-10· cited 10×
- State v. BootCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-04-09· cited 9×
- State v. OrtizCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-05-23· cited 5×
- State v. GriggsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-12-30· cited 4×
- State of Washington v. Haven Mary ScabbyrobeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-03-18· cited 4×
- State v. PoulosCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-02-25· cited 3×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-04-19· cited 2×
- State v. DoleshallCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-12-27· cited 2×
- State v. DerriWashington Supreme Court· 2022-06-23
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- State v. HilliardWashington Supreme Court· 1977-12-29· cited 90×
- State v. NettlesWashington Supreme Court· 1972-09-07· cited 35×
- State v. ThorkelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-03-24· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.