Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/21/2005

State v. Burdick

Citations

125 P.3d 1039
211 Ariz. 583
467 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
2005 Ariz. App. LEXIS 166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

addressing whether “unit of prosecution” for disorderly conduct is conduct or victims
addressing whether “unit of prosecution” for disorderly conduct is conduct or victims
“Whether a defendant can be punished for each victim of the crime of disorderly conduct is an issue of legislative intent.”
“[W]hen a defendant is charged with disorderly conduct for disturbing the peace of a particular person, the state is required to prove that the defendant knowingly disturbed the victim’s peace____”
“[W]here crimes against persons are involved we believe a separate interest of society has been invaded with each victim and that, therefore, where two persons are assaulted, there are two separate offenses.”
“[W]hen a defendant is charged with disorderly conduct for disturbing the peace of a particular person, the state is required to prove that the defendant knowingly disturbed the victim’s peace. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Brammer, Eckerstrom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.