State v. Bunker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding RCW 26.50.110 ambiguous and interpreting it in accord with the legislature's intention to make violating no-contact orders a crime
• reviewing former RCW 26.50.110(1) to determine whether a crime was committed when defendants were charged under the elevated felony provision
• finding former RCW 26.50.110 (2006) ambiguous and interpreting it in accord with the legislature’s intention to make violating no-contact orders a crime
• rejecting the State’s argument that because consent is not a defense to the crime of violating a no-contact order, the trial court is prohibited from considering the victim’s willing participation in the crime when sentencing the defendant
• rejecting the State’s argument that because consent is not a defense to the crime of violating a no-contact order the trial court is prohibited from considering the victim’s willing participation in the crime when sentencing the defendant
• remanding for trial court to consider this same mitigating factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bunker
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-08-26· cited 103×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-05-27· cited 25×
• City of Seattle v. May
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-24· cited 16×
• State v. Hogan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-06-19· cited 11×
• State v. Wofford
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-02-18· cited 9×
• INTERNET COMM. & ENTERTAINMENT CORP. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-02-10· cited 2×
• Internet Community & Entertainment Corp. v. Washington State Gambling Commission
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-02-10· cited 2×
• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-04-27· cited 2×

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and Industries
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-01-18· cited 349×
• Cockle v. Department of Labor & Industries
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-01-18· cited 343×
• State v. Gore
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-04-26· cited 316×
• State v. Grayson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-05-26· cited 232×
• State v. Garcia-Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-10-13· cited 186×
• City of Spokane v. County of Spokane
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-11-16· cited 104×
• City of Spokane v. Spokane County
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-11-16· cited 104×
• Tomlinson v. Clarke
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-02-27· cited 75×
• State v. Jones
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-02-18· cited 69×
• State v. George
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-06-07· cited 61×
• In Re Matteson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-07-03· cited 59×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Matteson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 59×
• Johnson v. Continental West, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1983-05-12· cited 56×
• State v. Lilyblad
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-02-07· cited 54×
• Jacques v. Sharp
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-09-09· cited 22×
• State v. MacKenzie
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-12-23· cited 18×
• State v. BEK
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-11-14· cited 13×
• State v. B.E.K.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-11-14· cited 13×
• State v. R.J.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-04-19· cited 7×