Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/27/2009
State v. Allen
Citations
- 150 Wash. App. 300
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no double jeopardy when defendant was charged with multiple violations of a no-contact order when contacts took place on different days
- each act of sending an e- 7 No. 48053-1-II mail constituted a statutory violation
- two violations based on two separate e-mails opened on same day
- two violations based on two separate e-mails opened on same day
- each act of sending an e-mail constituted a statutory violation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Houghton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court· 2010-08-26· cited 103×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-10-25· cited 72×
- State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-09· cited 15×
- State v. BreitungCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-04-20· cited 12×
- State Of Washington v. David NovickCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-10-25· cited 6×
- State of Washington v. Jesus Vidales MoralesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-09
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-01-07
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-08· cited 629×
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court· 1999-03-11· cited 399×
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 2001-01-18· cited 349×
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 2001-01-18· cited 343×
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court· 1984-04-26· cited 316×
- State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court· 1998-10-15· cited 263×
- Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-31· cited 194×
- Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court· 2005-10-13· cited 140×
- All Seasons Living Centers, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 124×
- State v. NitschCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-24· cited 124×
- In Re Sehome Park Care Center, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 122×
- State ex rel. Citizens v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court· 2004-04-08· cited 121×
- STATE EX REL.(CAT) v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court· 2004-04-08· cited 120×
- State v. MendozaWashington Supreme Court· 2009-04-16· cited 114×
- State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court· 2000-04-27· cited 112×
- City of Spokane v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 2006-11-16· cited 104×
- City of Spokane v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2006-11-16· cited 104×
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 98×
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 98×
- State v. WestlingWashington Supreme Court· 2002-02-21· cited 94×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.