State v. Brown
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1123
Syllabus
TAMPERING WITH RECORDS – R.C. 2913.42 – R.C. 2945.75 – VERDICT FORM – SENTENCING – RESTITUTION – R.C. 2929.18: Because the verdict form for the offense of tampering with records did not specify the degree of the offense or the element that elevated the offense from a first-degree misdemeanor to a third-degree felony, defendant could only have been convicted of the least degree of the offense, and the trial court erred in entering a conviction against defendant for tampering with records as a third-degree felony. The trial court erred by failing to impose a specific amount of restitution in open court at the sentencing hearing.
Judges: Kinsley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PelfreyOhio Supreme Court· 2007-02-07· cited 171×
- State v. LeonhartOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-16· cited 33×
- State v. MilesOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-29· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Howery v. PowersOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-04· cited 9×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-05· cited 3×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.